Years 2-4
Testing the corrective assumption of dual process theory in reasoning
Year 1
Lab rot 1 (M2 internship): Fast logic? Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory in reasoning.
Lab rot 2: How inherently noisy is inhibitory control in humans?
Biography/CV
Articles:
Aczel, B., Szollosi, A. & Bago, B. (2018). The Effect of Transparency on Framing Effects in Within-subjects Designs. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 25-39. [IF:1.74]
Szollosi, A., Bago, B., Szaszi, B. & Aczel, B. (2017). Determinants of Confidence in the bat & ball problem. Acta Psychologica, 180, 1-7. [IF: 2.0]
Frey, D., Bago, B., De Neys, W. (2017). Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. [IF: 2.3]
Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90-109. [IF: 3.4]
Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). The rise and fall of conflicting intuitions during reasoning. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. London, UK, 26th – 29th July, 2017., pp. 87-92
Frey, D., De Neys, W., & Bago, B. (2016). The Jury of Intuition: Conflict Detection and Intuitive Processing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 335-337. [IF: 2.9]
Aczel, B., Szollosi, A., & Bago, B. (2015). Lax monitoring versus logical intuition: The determinants of confidence in conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 99-117. [IF: 2.8]
Aczel, B., Kekecs, Z., Bago, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A., (2015). An Empirical Analysis of the Methodology of Automatic Imitation Research in Strategic Context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Action, 41(4), 1049-1062.
Aczel, B., Bago, B., Szollosi, A, Foldes, A & Lukács, B. (2015). Measuring individual differences in decision biases: methodological considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. [IF: 2.3]
Aczel, B., Bago, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A. & Lukacs, B. (2015). Is it time for studying real-life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. [IF 2.3]